State v. Coover

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Coover

49 Mo. 432

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedFebruary 15, 1872

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 Mo. 432 (State v. Coover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Coover, 49 Mo. 432 (Mo. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Bliss, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant was indicted for gambling, and pleaded guilty. He seeks to reverse the judgment because no indictment would lie at the time for the offense. (State v. Huffschmidt, 47 Mo. 73.) But the court has since held that Avhere a party voluntarily submits' himself to the jurisdiction by pleading guilty, the judgment is good and will not be reversed. (State v. Warnke, 48 Mo. 457.) The court below set aside the judgment on motion, and its action is reversed and the original judgment affirmed.

Judge Wagner concurs. Judge Adams absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bliss, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant was indicted for gambling, and pleaded guilty. He seeks to reverse the judgment because no indictment would lie at the time for the offense. (State v. Huffschmidt, 47 Mo. 73.) But the court has since held that Avhere a party voluntarily submits' himself to the jurisdiction by pleading guilty, the judgment is good and will not be reversed. (State v. Warnke, 48 Mo. 457.) The court below set aside the judgment on motion, and its action is reversed and the original judgment affirmed.

Judge Wagner concurs. Judge Adams absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 Mo. 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-coover-mo-1872.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack