State v. Cooley
273 S.E.2d 442, 301 N.C. 96, 1980 N.C. LEXIS 1292
This text of 273 S.E.2d 442 (State v. Cooley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Cooley, 273 S.E.2d 442, 301 N.C. 96, 1980 N.C. LEXIS 1292 (N.C. 1980).
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Claude Vance COOLEY.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jo Anne Sanford, Raleigh, for the State.
*443 Blanchard, Tucker, Twiggs & Denson, Raleigh, for defendant.
Defendant's notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G. S. § 731. 47 N.CApp. 376,268 S.E.2d 87. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Motion allowed; petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Cooley
268 S.E.2d 87 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
273 S.E.2d 442, 301 N.C. 96, 1980 N.C. LEXIS 1292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cooley-nc-1980.