State v. Cook

126 P.3d 754, 203 Or. App. 806, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 34
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Cook. Read the opinion of the Court — 190 Or. App. 568
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 18, 2006·No. 0503-64087; A128312·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder, is unable to provide for his basic personal needs, and is not receiving such care as is necessary for health and safety. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. On de novo review, we find the state’s concession to be well founded and, therefore, accept it.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Cook, 126 P.3d 754, 203 Or. App. 806, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 34 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

126 P.3d 754 (State v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130