State v. Cook
99 P. 940, 53 Or. 243, 1909 Ore. LEXIS 117
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
These defendants were tried in the circuit court under an indictment charging them with unlawfully playing a gambling game known as “Klondike,” and they, having been convicted and sentenced to pay a fine, appeal. The same legal problem is presented here as in State V. Bay, 53 Or. 241 (99 Pac. 939), making an affirmance necessary; and it is so ordered. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Cook, 99 P. 940, 53 Or. 243, 1909 Ore. LEXIS 117 (Or. 1909).
99 P. 940 (State v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harlow v. Clow
223 P. 541 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1924)