State v. Cook
99 P. 940, 53 Or. 243, 1909 Ore. LEXIS 117
This text of 99 P. 940 (State v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Cook, 99 P. 940, 53 Or. 243, 1909 Ore. LEXIS 117 (Or. 1909).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
These defendants were tried in the circuit court under an indictment charging them with unlawfully playing a gambling game known as “Klondike,” and they, having been convicted and sentenced to pay a fine, appeal. The same legal problem is presented here as in State V. Bay, 53 Or. 241 (99 Pac. 939), making an affirmance necessary; and it is so ordered. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harlow v. Clow
223 P. 541 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1924)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
99 P. 940, 53 Or. 243, 1909 Ore. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cook-or-1909.