State v. Cook
This text of 724 S.E.2d 917 (State v. Cook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Arthur Junior COOK.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Anne Bleyman, for Cook, Arthur Junior.
*918 David P. Brenskelle, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.
Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 17th of February 2012 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th of April 2012."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 17th of February 2012 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th of April 2012."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
724 S.E.2d 917, 2012 WL 1378521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cook-nc-2012.