State v. Coody

240 S.W.3d 734, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1466, 2007 WL 3070795
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 23, 2007·No. WD 66962·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Coody appeals from his conviction for first-degree robbery. He contends the trial court abused its discretion in: (1) admitting hearsay evidence of cell phone records; and (2) refusing to grant a mistrial when a police officer gave testimony that violated Goody’s constitutional right to remain silent. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no abuse of discretion and affirm the judgment of conviction. We have provided the parties with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Coody, 240 S.W.3d 734, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1466, 2007 WL 3070795 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

240 S.W.3d 734 (State v. Coody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neubauer v. Neubauer
240 S.W.3d 734 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)