State v. Conwell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Conwell

13 A. 49, 80 Me. 80, 1888 Me. LEXIS 13

DecidedJanuary 27, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A. 49 (State v. Conwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Conwell, 13 A. 49, 80 Me. 80, 1888 Me. LEXIS 13 (Me. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Haskell, J.

The May term of the superior court adjourned sine die June 1, 1885. The former conviction is laid at that term "to wit on the tenth day of August, A. D. 1885,” when a certificate of decision was received by the clerk from the law court.

The May term had ended before the cause had been decided in the law court. The defendant’s recognizance taken when his cause was marked " law ” required his attendance " from term to term until and including the term of said court, next after the [82]*82certificate of decision shall be recived” from the law court. R. S., c. 134, § 26. Until that term, his attendance was not required and no judgment could be rendered against him.

Judgment for the State, hut not for prior conviction.

Peters, C. J., Walton, Virgin, Libbey and Foster, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haskell, J.

The May term of the superior court adjourned sine die June 1, 1885. The former conviction is laid at that term "to wit on the tenth day of August, A. D. 1885,” when a certificate of decision was received by the clerk from the law court.

The May term had ended before the cause had been decided in the law court. The defendant’s recognizance taken when his cause was marked " law ” required his attendance " from term to term until and including the term of said court, next after the [82]*82certificate of decision shall be recived” from the law court. R. S., c. 134, § 26. Until that term, his attendance was not required and no judgment could be rendered against him.

Judgment for the State, hut not for prior conviction.

Peters, C. J., Walton, Virgin, Libbey and Foster, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A. 49, 80 Me. 80, 1888 Me. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-conwell-me-1888.