State v. Contreras-Rebollar

430 P.3d 274
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 29, 2018
DocketNo. 96243-0
StatusPublished

This text of 430 P.3d 274 (State v. Contreras-Rebollar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Contreras-Rebollar, 430 P.3d 274 (Wash. 2018).

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered the petition for review at its November 27, 2018, Motion Calendar. The Department unanimously agreed that in light of 2018 amendments to the statutes governing legal financial obligations and this court's decision in State v. Ramirez , 191 Wn.2d 732, 426 P.3d 714 (2018), the Petitioner as an indigent offender may not be made to pay the $200 filing fee. RCW 36.18.020(2)(h). The Department therefore unanimously agreed that the petition for review should be granted as to the $200 filing fee issue. The Department also unanimously agreed that the petition for review raises no other issue that merits this court's consideration. Accordingly,

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is granted only on the issue of the $200 filing fee. The case is remanded to the trial court to amend *275the judgement and sentence to strike the $200 filing fee.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ramirez
426 P.3d 714 (Washington Supreme Court, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
430 P.3d 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-contreras-rebollar-wash-2018.