State v. Conrad

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Conrad

706 N.E.2d 334, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1507, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 527

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 22, 1999·No. 99-323·Published

Opinion

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

Hamilton App. No. C-980262. On February 10, 1999, appellant filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction without a copy of the court of appeals’ opinion and judgment entry being appealed. S.Ct.Prae.R. III(1)(D) requires that a copy of the court of appeals’ opinion and judgment entry being appealed shall be attached to the memorandum. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

Hamilton App. No. C-980262. On February 10, 1999, appellant filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction without a copy of the court of appeals’ opinion and judgment entry being appealed. S.Ct.Prae.R. III(1)(D) requires that a copy of the court of appeals’ opinion and judgment entry being appealed shall be attached to the memorandum. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

State v. Conrad, 706 N.E.2d 334, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1507, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 527 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

706 N.E.2d 334 (State v. Conrad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.