State v. Conrad

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Conrad

706 N.E.2d 334, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1507, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 527

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 22, 1999

Docket99-323

StatusPublished

This text of 706 N.E.2d 334 (State v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Conrad, 706 N.E.2d 334, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1507, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 527 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

Hamilton App. No. C-980262. On February 10, 1999, appellant filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction without a copy of the court of appeals’ opinion and judgment entry being appealed. S.Ct.Prae.R. III(1)(D) requires that a copy of the court of appeals’ opinion and judgment entry being appealed shall be attached to the memorandum. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

Hamilton App. No. C-980262. On February 10, 1999, appellant filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction without a copy of the court of appeals’ opinion and judgment entry being appealed. S.Ct.Prae.R. III(1)(D) requires that a copy of the court of appeals’ opinion and judgment entry being appealed shall be attached to the memorandum. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

706 N.E.2d 334, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1507, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-conrad-ohio-1999.