State v. Conrad
Opinion
Granted in part; denied in part.
The record of sentencing does not demonstrate adequate compliance with La.Code Crim.Proc. art. 894.1, nor does it provide a factual basis for imposition of the present sentence. Therefore, the sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentenc-ing.
Upon resentencing, the district court should comply with La.Code Crim.Proc. art. 894.1, as amended by Act 22 of 1991, which requires consideration of the sentencing guidelines promulgated by the Louisiana Sentencing Commission in determining the appropriate sentence to be imposed.
Granted in part with order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
625 So. 2d 158 (State v. Conrad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.