State v. Conrad

625 So. 2d 158, 1993 La. LEXIS 2745, 1993 WL 391060
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Conrad. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 La. LEXIS 2153
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 1, 1993·No. No. 93-K-1717·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Granted in part; denied in part.

The record of sentencing does not demonstrate adequate compliance with La.Code Crim.Proc. art. 894.1, nor does it provide a factual basis for imposition of the present sentence. Therefore, the sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentenc-ing.

Upon resentencing, the district court should comply with La.Code Crim.Proc. art. 894.1, as amended by Act 22 of 1991, which requires consideration of the sentencing guidelines promulgated by the Louisiana Sentencing Commission in determining the appropriate sentence to be imposed.

Granted in part with order.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Conrad, 625 So. 2d 158, 1993 La. LEXIS 2745, 1993 WL 391060 (La. 1993).

625 So. 2d 158 (State v. Conrad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 894.1
Louisiana § 894.1