State v. Connor

163 A.3d 619, 325 Conn. 920, 2017 WL 3140284, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 143
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedApril 26, 2017
StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.3d 619 (State v. Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Connor, 163 A.3d 619, 325 Conn. 920, 2017 WL 3140284, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 143 (Colo. 2017).

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 170 Conn.App. 615, 155 A.3d 289 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Whether the Appellate Court properly determined that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the defendant was competent to represent himself at trial."

ESPINOSA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Connor
155 A.3d 289 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 A.3d 619, 325 Conn. 920, 2017 WL 3140284, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-connor-conn-2017.