State v. Connor

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Connor

163 A.3d 619, 325 Conn. 920, 2017 WL 3140284, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 143

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Connor. Read the opinion of the Court — 321 Conn. 350 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 26, 2017·Published

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 170 Conn.App. 615, 155 A.3d 289 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Whether the Appellate Court properly determined that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the defendant was competent to represent himself at trial."

ESPINOSA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 170 Conn.App. 615, 155 A.3d 289 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Whether the Appellate Court properly determined that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the defendant was competent to represent himself at trial."

ESPINOSA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

State v. Connor, 163 A.3d 619, 325 Conn. 920, 2017 WL 3140284, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 143 (Colo. 2017).

Pincite

163 A.3d 619 (State v. Connor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related