State v. Connelly

Court of Appeals of Georgia

State v. Connelly

225 S.E.2d 519, 138 Ga. App. 121, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2075

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 12, 1976·No. 51910·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Evans, Judge.

Two defendants were charged separately with the crime of murder. The state moved' to try the two cases together on the ground that they arose out of one transaction. The defendants objected. Upon inquiry as to whether the state was asking for the death penalty and being assured it was not so asking, the court overruled the objection by defense and ordered the cases to be tried jointly. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty as to one of the defendants, but the other defendant was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to serve 20 years.

Upon consideration of defendant’s motion for new trial, as amended, the same was granted on the grounds that the court erred in failing to grant separate trials and in trying the two cases together. The state appeals. Held:

Under Code Ann. § 27-2101, when two or more [122] defendants axe jointly indicted for a capital offense, and the state waives the death penalty as here, the defendants may be tried jointly or separately in the discretion of the trial court. Even though the defendants may have been joint offenders, nevertheless the state indicted them separately. It appears that the lower court entertained a misconception of the law, for if a defendant is indicted separately, he has a right to be tried separately under the law unless he voluntarily waives it. See Towns v. State, 149 Ga. 613 (1) (101 SE 678). The court did not err in granting a new trial on this ground alone.

Submitted March 1, 1976 Decided March 12, 1976. F. Larry Salmon, District Attorney, Robert.D. Engelhart, Assistant District Attorney, for appellant. W. Gene Richardson, Vaughn Terrell, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Panned, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans, Judge.

Two defendants were charged separately with the crime of murder. The state moved' to try the two cases together on the ground that they arose out of one transaction. The defendants objected. Upon inquiry as to whether the state was asking for the death penalty and being assured it was not so asking, the court overruled the objection by defense and ordered the cases to be tried jointly. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty as to one of the defendants, but the other defendant was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to serve 20 years.

Upon consideration of defendant’s motion for new trial, as amended, the same was granted on the grounds that the court erred in failing to grant separate trials and in trying the two cases together. The state appeals. Held:

Under Code Ann. § 27-2101, when two or more [122] defendants axe jointly indicted for a capital offense, and the state waives the death penalty as here, the defendants may be tried jointly or separately in the discretion of the trial court. Even though the defendants may have been joint offenders, nevertheless the state indicted them separately. It appears that the lower court entertained a misconception of the law, for if a defendant is indicted separately, he has a right to be tried separately under the law unless he voluntarily waives it. See Towns v. State, 149 Ga. 613 (1) (101 SE 678). The court did not err in granting a new trial on this ground alone.

Submitted March 1, 1976 Decided March 12, 1976. F. Larry Salmon, District Attorney, Robert.D. Engelhart, Assistant District Attorney, for appellant. W. Gene Richardson, Vaughn Terrell, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Panned, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

State v. Connelly, 225 S.E.2d 519, 138 Ga. App. 121, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2075 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

225 S.E.2d 519 (State v. Connelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related