State v. Conley

411 So. 2d 448
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 10, 1982
Docket81-KA-1767
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 411 So. 2d 448 (State v. Conley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Conley, 411 So. 2d 448 (La. 1982).

Opinion

411 So.2d 448 (1982)

STATE of Louisiana
v.
Sterling A. CONLEY.

No. 81-KA-1767.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 10, 1982.

*449 William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Louise Korns, Richard Petre, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.

Roy Raspanti, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Sterling Conley was charged by bill of information with simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling, in violation of La.R.S. 14:62.2. Following the denial of a motion to suppress evidence seized incident to his arrest, defendant entered a plea of guilty, reserving his right to appellate review of the trial court's ruling. State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La.1976). The trial court accepted the plea and sentenced defendant to three years at hard labor, without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. Defendant now appeals his conviction and sentence to this Court, urging two assignments of error.

We have reviewed defendant's challenge to the trial court's denial of his suppression motion and find it to lack merit. For this reason, the defendant's conviction is affirmed. We agree, however, with his contention that the trial court erred in denying the accused eligibility for probation, parole, or suspension of sentence for the entire term of his sentence. In pertinent part, La.R.S. 14:62.2 provides:

Whoever commits the crime of simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than one year, without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence, nor more than twelve years.

Construing this provision in State v. Boowell, 406 So.2d 213 (La.1981), this Court accepted the defendant's contention that the ineligibility provision should attach only to the statute's minimum one-year term. Thus, the sentence imposed herein was clearly illegal and must be vacated.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED AND CASE REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ellis
161 So. 3d 64 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)
State v. Jacobs
48 So. 3d 1218 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Paul Jacobs
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010
State v. Singleton
871 So. 2d 596 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004)
State v. Jones
855 So. 2d 408 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2003)
State v. Smith
677 So. 2d 589 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
State v. King
639 So. 2d 1231 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1994)
State v. Martin
599 So. 2d 422 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1992)
State v. Gracia
527 So. 2d 488 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)
State v. Hardan
519 So. 2d 224 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)
State v. Glenn
513 So. 2d 445 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
State v. Wilder
499 So. 2d 432 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
State v. Anderson
499 So. 2d 140 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
State v. Reed
482 So. 2d 76 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
State v. Hayes
476 So. 2d 870 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)
State v. LeClear
474 So. 2d 554 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)
State ex rel. Thomas v. Hood
466 So. 2d 1296 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1985)
State v. Williams
464 So. 2d 451 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)
State v. Ogletree
446 So. 2d 415 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
411 So. 2d 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-conley-la-1982.