State v. Conklin

477 P.3d 436, 307 Or. App. 848
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 9, 2020
DocketA168675
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 477 P.3d 436 (State v. Conklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Conklin, 477 P.3d 436, 307 Or. App. 848 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Submitted March 10, affirmed December 9, 2020

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. TED SHANE CONKLIN, Defendant-Appellant. Lane County Circuit Court 16CR22033, 17CR79053; A168675 (Control), A168674 477 P3d 436

Debra K. Vogt, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Eric Johansen, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jonathan N. Schildt, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and Mooney, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Horner, 306 Or App 402, 474 P3d 394 (2020).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Abeln
477 P.3d 436 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
477 P.3d 436, 307 Or. App. 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-conklin-orctapp-2020.