State v. Conklin
78 A. 1135, 78 N.J.L. 743, 49 Vroom 743, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 173
This text of 78 A. 1135 (State v. Conklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Conklin, 78 A. 1135, 78 N.J.L. 743, 49 Vroom 743, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 173 (N.J. 1910).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, with costs, there being no error disclosed in the record or proceedings.
Por affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon, JJ. 14.
Por reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
78 A. 1135, 78 N.J.L. 743, 49 Vroom 743, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-conklin-nj-1910.