State v. Conger

883 P.2d 1338, 131 Or. App. 263, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1576
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 2, 1994·No. 90-01-1676-C; CA A72340·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This case was remanded to us to consider defendant’s remaining two assignments of error, following the Supreme Court’s reversal of our disposition of defendant’s first assignment of error. State v. Conger, 319 Or 484, 878 P2d 1089 (1994). We have considered those assignments and find them to be without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Conger, 883 P.2d 1338, 131 Or. App. 263, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1576 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

883 P.2d 1338 (State v. Conger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Conger
878 P.2d 1089 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1994)