State v. Conger
This text of 2024 Ohio 128 (State v. Conger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Conger, 2024-Ohio-128.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
CLINTON COUNTY
: STATE OF OHIO, : CASE NO. CA2023-08-017 Appellee, : DECISION 1/16/2024 - vs - :
: CHRISTOPHER L. CONGER, : Appellant.
CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM CLINTON COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CRI 2023-5080
Andrew T. McCoy, Clinton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Katie Wilkin, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Craig A. Newburger, for appellant.
Per Curiam.
{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by
appellant, Christopher L. Conger, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the
transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Clinton County Court of Common
Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.
{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review Clinton CA2023-08-017
of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court
prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;
(2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87
S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine
whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of
appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for
appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of
both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.
{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response
having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error
prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel
for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed
for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
S. POWELL, P.J., M. POWELL and BYRNE, JJ., concur.
NOTICE TO THE CLERK:
Serve a copy of this decision upon appellant at: #A817997, Christopher L. Conger, Mansfield Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 788, Mansfield, OH 44901
-2- [Cite as State v. Conger, 2024-Ohio-128.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 Ohio 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-conger-ohioctapp-2024.