State v. Conger

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Conger

280 S.W.3d 177, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 468, 2009 WL 981215

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 14, 2009·No. No. WD 69657·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanley E. Conger, tried by the court, was convicted of two counts of enticement of a child, pursuant to section 566.151, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2006. The trial court sentenced him to two consecutive ten-year terms of imprisonment. On appeal, Conger asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal because he claims the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to show that his actions were “for the purpose of engaging in sexual conduct.” The point is denied and the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanley E. Conger, tried by the court, was convicted of two counts of enticement of a child, pursuant to section 566.151, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2006. The trial court sentenced him to two consecutive ten-year terms of imprisonment. On appeal, Conger asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal because he claims the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to show that his actions were “for the purpose of engaging in sexual conduct.” The point is denied and the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Conger, 280 S.W.3d 177, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 468, 2009 WL 981215 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

280 S.W.3d 177 (State v. Conger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.