State v. Congdon
529 P.2d 773, 96 Idaho 377, 1974 Ida. LEXIS 460
Opinion
Appellant, who was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance based upon his plea of guilty, appeals solely on the claim that he was under the influence of paint thinner fumes at the time he entered his plea of guilty, and thus that- plea was not voluntarily entered. The record does not support this allegation. Such matters, outside of the record, cannot be considered on appeal, but must be raised, if at all, by an application for post conviction relief. I.C. § 19-4901 et seq.
Judgment of conviction affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Congdon, 529 P.2d 773, 96 Idaho 377, 1974 Ida. LEXIS 460 (Idaho 1974).
529 P.2d 773 (State v. Congdon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Spry
897 P.2d 1002 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1995)
Kraft v. State
579 P.2d 1197 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1978)
State v. Lawrence
554 P.2d 953 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1976)