State v. Congdon

Idaho Supreme Court

State v. Congdon

529 P.2d 773, 96 Idaho 377, 1974 Ida. LEXIS 460

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 20, 1974

DocketNo. 11488

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 529 P.2d 773 (State v. Congdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Congdon, 529 P.2d 773, 96 Idaho 377, 1974 Ida. LEXIS 460 (Idaho 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, who was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance based upon his plea of guilty, appeals solely on the claim that he was under the influence of paint thinner fumes at the time he entered his plea of guilty, and thus that- plea was not voluntarily entered. The record does not support this allegation. Such matters, outside of the record, cannot be considered on appeal, but must be raised, if at all, by an application for post conviction relief. I.C. § 19-4901 et seq.

Judgment of conviction affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, who was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance based upon his plea of guilty, appeals solely on the claim that he was under the influence of paint thinner fumes at the time he entered his plea of guilty, and thus that- plea was not voluntarily entered. The record does not support this allegation. Such matters, outside of the record, cannot be considered on appeal, but must be raised, if at all, by an application for post conviction relief. I.C. § 19-4901 et seq.

Judgment of conviction affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

529 P.2d 773, 96 Idaho 377, 1974 Ida. LEXIS 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-congdon-idaho-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack