State v. Coney
This text of 373 P.2d 903 (State v. Coney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendants-appellants and the plaintiff-appellee have filed separate petitions for rehearing in the above-entitled canse.
The contentions set forth in the respective petitions have been carefully examined and considered. The court finds that the points presented are not new, having been fully briefed and argued by counsel and considered by this court in its decision.
The petitions are therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
373 P.2d 903, 46 Haw. 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-coney-haw-1962.