State v. Concaugh

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Concaugh

167 Conn. 674

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 3, 1974·Published

Opinion

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, [675] ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the defendant files his brief on or before January 10,1975.

John W. Kline, for the appellant (defendant). Ernest J. Diette, Jr., assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state). Argued December 3 decided December 3, 1974

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, [675] ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the defendant files his brief on or before January 10,1975.

John W. Kline, for the appellant (defendant). Ernest J. Diette, Jr., assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state). Argued December 3 decided December 3, 1974

State v. Concaugh, 167 Conn. 674 (Colo. 1974).

Pincite

167 Conn. 674 (State v. Concaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.