State v. Conaway

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Conaway

462 S.W.3d 472, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 561, 2015 WL 3458263

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 26, 2015

DocketNo. ED 101466

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 462 S.W.3d 472 (State v. Conaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Conaway, 462 S.W.3d 472, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 561, 2015 WL 3458263 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Coy Conaway (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County after a jury found him guilty of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to improperly personalize closing argument.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI