State v. Compas

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Compas

61 Mo. App. 290, 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 55

DecidedFebruary 26, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 61 Mo. App. 290 (State v. Compas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Compas, 61 Mo. App. 290, 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 55 (Mo. Ct. App. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Bond, J.

—An examination of the record in this case discloses that defendant was indicted, tried and convicted, for selling intoxicating liquor to a minor without the written consent of his parent. The case comes here by appeal.

[291]*291Appellant has filed no brief or- statement of the points relied upon by . him for a reversal. The record shows a valid indictment. The evidence of the minor and his father contained in the bill o,f exceptions amply sustains the finding-of the court which tried the case sitting as a jury. State v. Bruder, 35 Mo. App. 475. No instructions were asked or given. The motion for new trial is based only on the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment. There is no motion in arrest; nor is there any error patent on the record proper. The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bond, J.

—An examination of the record in this case discloses that defendant was indicted, tried and convicted, for selling intoxicating liquor to a minor without the written consent of his parent. The case comes here by appeal.

[291]*291Appellant has filed no brief or- statement of the points relied upon by . him for a reversal. The record shows a valid indictment. The evidence of the minor and his father contained in the bill o,f exceptions amply sustains the finding-of the court which tried the case sitting as a jury. State v. Bruder, 35 Mo. App. 475. No instructions were asked or given. The motion for new trial is based only on the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment. There is no motion in arrest; nor is there any error patent on the record proper. The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Mo. App. 290, 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-compas-moctapp-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack