State v. Comer

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Comer

768 N.E.2d 1181, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1472

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 29, 2002

Docket2002-0351

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 768 N.E.2d 1181 (State v. Comer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Comer, 768 N.E.2d 1181, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1472 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Lucas App. No. L-99-1296, 2002-Ohio-233. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Decision and Judgment Entry dated February 21, 2002, at 4:

“When a trial court sentences an individual to non-minimum, consecutive or maximum sentences, must the trial court make the requisite findings from the bench at the sentencing hearing or is it sufficient to make the findings for the first time in the sentencing entry?”

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents. Resnick, J., not participating.

The conflict case is State v. Williams (2000), 136 Ohio App.3d 570, 737 N.E.2d 139.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2002-0422, State v. Comer, Lucas App. No. L-99-1296, 2002-Ohio-233.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI