State v. Combes
This text of State v. Combes (State v. Combes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001139 03-FEB-2017 09:57 AM
SCWC-14-0001139
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
ALFRED W.K. COMBES, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0001139; CR. NO. 12-1-1895)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon consideration of Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Alfred
W.K. Combes’s application for writ of certiorari, it appears that
Combes’s application was due on January 26, 2017, which was 30
days after the Intermediate Court of Appeals’ December 27, 2016
judgment. Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes (HRS) § 602-59(c) (Supp.
2014); Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule
40.1(a)(1)(2016).
Combes’s application was filed on January 27, 2017. The
application is untimely and thus, this court lacks appellate
jurisdiction. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for writ of
certiorari is dismissed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 3, 2016.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Combes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-combes-haw-2017.