State v. Columbia & Hampshire T. P. Co.
34 Tenn. 254
Opinion
The information and sei. fa. thereon are bad; because they do not allege a wilful non-feasance and misfeasance in respect to' the specifications and charges relied on, as a forfeiture of the defendant’s franchise.
Leave was properly granted to the plaintiff to amend; but no amendment was made, and the pleadings remain as they were when instituted. The amendment cannot be made in this court, under the statute of jeofails, it not being a case under that statute.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Columbia & Hampshire T. P. Co., 34 Tenn. 254 (Tenn. 1854).
34 Tenn. 254 (State v. Columbia & Hampshire T. P. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.