State v. Colon
This text of 696 So. 2d 943 (State v. Colon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After Edilberto Colon pleaded no contest to trafficking in methamphetamine, the trial court sentenced him to two years’ community control to be followed by two years’ drug offender probation. This sentence was a downward departure from the guidelines, but the court never filed written reasons for the departure. Colon concedes that the court erred. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for sentencing within the guidelines. See Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).1 Colon may be entitled to credit against his sentence for the time he served on community control pending the result in this case. See Fraser v. State, 602 So.2d 1299, 1300 (Fla.1992) (if trial court erroneously imposed a downward departure sentence and the defendant has been successfully serving community control, he may be entitled to credit against his guidelines sentence for those days served).
Reversed and remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
696 So. 2d 943, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7740, 1997 WL 375053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-colon-fladistctapp-1997.