State v. Colon

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Colon

632 A.2d 705, 227 Conn. 926

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 5, 1993·No. SC 14847·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 402 (AC 11454, AC 11693), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[927] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14847. Decided October 5, 1993 John A. East III, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Kent Drager, assistant public defender, in opposition.

“1. Under the circumstances of this case, did the failure of the issuing judge to sign the jurat on the affidavit invalidate the search warrant?

“2. If the answer to question 1. is yes, should the remedy have been exclusion of the evidence seized pursuant to the warrant?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 402 (AC 11454, AC 11693), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[927] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14847. Decided October 5, 1993 John A. East III, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Kent Drager, assistant public defender, in opposition.

“1. Under the circumstances of this case, did the failure of the issuing judge to sign the jurat on the affidavit invalidate the search warrant?

“2. If the answer to question 1. is yes, should the remedy have been exclusion of the evidence seized pursuant to the warrant?”

State v. Colon, 632 A.2d 705, 227 Conn. 926 (Colo. 1993).

Pincite

632 A.2d 705 (State v. Colon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related