State v. Collymore

153 A.3d 1288, 324 Conn. 913, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 32
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 25, 2017·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 168 Conn.App. 847, 148 A.3d 1059 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Whether the Appellate Court properly held that a prosecutor's grant of immunity to a witness for his testimony during the state's case-in-chief does not extend to the same witness' testimony when later called by the defendant as a witness?

*1289"2. If the answer to the first question is no, was the error nonetheless harmless?

"3. Whether in-court identification testimony made by the victim's mother and brother, contrary to their pretrial statements, violated the defendant's due process rights pursuant to State v. Dickson, 322 Conn. 410, 141 A.3d 810 (2016) ?"

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Collymore, 153 A.3d 1288, 324 Conn. 913, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 32 (Colo. 2017).

153 A.3d 1288 (State v. Collymore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Collymore
334 Conn. 431 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2020)
State v. Angel M.
183 A.3d 636 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2018)