State v. Collymore
This text of 153 A.3d 1288 (State v. Collymore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court,
"1. Whether the Appellate Court properly held that a prosecutor's grant of immunity to a witness for his testimony during the state's case-in-chief does not extend to the same witness' testimony when later called by the defendant as a witness?
*1289"2. If the answer to the first question is no, was the error nonetheless harmless?
"3. Whether in-court identification testimony made by the victim's mother and brother, contrary to their pretrial statements, violated the defendant's due process rights pursuant to State v. Dickson,
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 A.3d 1288, 324 Conn. 913, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-collymore-conn-2017.