State v. Collins
820 P.2d 902, 109 Or. App. 682, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1694
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 13, 1991
DocketC890685CR; CA A67049
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 820 P.2d 902 (State v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Collins, 820 P.2d 902, 109 Or. App. 682, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1694 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing a special condition of probation that defendant unconditionally submit to bodily substance tests. ORS 137.540(2). We accept the concession.
Conviction affirmed; special condition of probation 16 vacated insofar as it requires defendant to submit unconditionally to bodily substance tests; remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Leen
832 P.2d 49 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
820 P.2d 902, 109 Or. App. 682, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-collins-orctapp-1991.