State v. Collins

820 P.2d 902, 109 Or. App. 682, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1694
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 13, 1991·No. C890685CR; CA A67049·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing a special condition of probation that defendant unconditionally submit to bodily substance tests. ORS 137.540(2). We accept the concession.

Conviction affirmed; special condition of probation 16 vacated insofar as it requires defendant to submit unconditionally to bodily substance tests; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Collins, 820 P.2d 902, 109 Or. App. 682, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1694 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

820 P.2d 902 (State v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Leen
832 P.2d 49 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)