State v. Collins

160 S.E.2d 291, 273 N.C. 479, 1968 N.C. LEXIS 623
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 10, 1968
StatusPublished

This text of 160 S.E.2d 291 (State v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Collins, 160 S.E.2d 291, 273 N.C. 479, 1968 N.C. LEXIS 623 (N.C. 1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The indictment being in proper form, the court being properly organized, the defendant having entered a plea of guilty through his court appointed counsel, the sentence being less than the maximum provided in the statute for the offense charged, G.S. 148-45, there was no ground upon which the motion in arrest of judgment could properly be allowed. There was, consequently, no error in its denial. It being stipulated in the record that the case “was tried in accordance with the rules and practices of the courts,” and no error in the proceedings appearing in the record, there is no basis upon which a new trial may be awarded.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 S.E.2d 291, 273 N.C. 479, 1968 N.C. LEXIS 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-collins-nc-1968.