State v. Collins

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Collins

989 S.W.2d 953, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 568

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Collins. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 269 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 4, 1999·No. No. 74170·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of attempted escape from confinement, in violation of Section 575.210 RSMo (1994), on which he was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to eight years imprisonment consecutive to any prison sentence then being served.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of attempted escape from confinement, in violation of Section 575.210 RSMo (1994), on which he was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to eight years imprisonment consecutive to any prison sentence then being served.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Collins, 989 S.W.2d 953, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 568 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

989 S.W.2d 953 (State v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.