State v. Collins

858 S.W.2d 859, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1215, 1993 WL 295097
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Collins. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1394
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 10, 1993·No. Nos. 60740, 63168·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Antoinette Collins, appeals from a judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, for stealing, third offense. She was sentenced as a persistent offender to imprisonment for ten years. Defendant also appeals from the denial of her Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

As to defendant’s direct appeal, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

The judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Collins, 858 S.W.2d 859, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1215, 1993 WL 295097 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

858 S.W.2d 859 (State v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.