State v. Collins

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Collins

201 So. 2d 225, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3555

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJuly 12, 1967

DocketNo. 36370

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 201 So. 2d 225 (State v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Collins, 201 So. 2d 225, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3555 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court in this case (Fla.App., 197 So.2d 574) is one of reversal. There appears, however, to be no majority opinion.

Petition for certiorari has been filed here alleging conflict with Roberts v. State, Fla., 164 So.2d 817; Grant v. State, Fla., 171 So.2d 361 and Male v. State, Fla.App., 189 So.2d 521, all relating to the admissibility of a confession.

In view of the reversal by the district court without a majority opinion setting forth the reasons therefor, request is respectfully made to the District Court of Appeal, Second District, that it prepare and adopt a majority opinion setting forth the theory and reasoning upon which the judgment of reversal is based. Jurisdiction of the cause is relinquished to that court temporarily for that purpose. When this has been accomplished, the cause shall be returned to this Court which will then proceed to determine whether or not sufficient conflict exists to require a further review here. See Solomon v. Sanitarians’ Registration Board, Fla., 147 So.2d 132; Sanitarians’ Registration Board v. Solomon, Fla.App., 148 So.2d 744, and Solomon v. Sanitarians’ Registration Board, Fla., 155 So.2d 353.

It is so ordered.

O’CONNELL, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court in this case (Fla.App., 197 So.2d 574) is one of reversal. There appears, however, to be no majority opinion.

Petition for certiorari has been filed here alleging conflict with Roberts v. State, Fla., 164 So.2d 817; Grant v. State, Fla., 171 So.2d 361 and Male v. State, Fla.App., 189 So.2d 521, all relating to the admissibility of a confession.

In view of the reversal by the district court without a majority opinion setting forth the reasons therefor, request is respectfully made to the District Court of Appeal, Second District, that it prepare and adopt a majority opinion setting forth the theory and reasoning upon which the judgment of reversal is based. Jurisdiction of the cause is relinquished to that court temporarily for that purpose. When this has been accomplished, the cause shall be returned to this Court which will then proceed to determine whether or not sufficient conflict exists to require a further review here. See Solomon v. Sanitarians’ Registration Board, Fla., 147 So.2d 132; Sanitarians’ Registration Board v. Solomon, Fla.App., 148 So.2d 744, and Solomon v. Sanitarians’ Registration Board, Fla., 155 So.2d 353.

It is so ordered.

O’CONNELL, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 So. 2d 225, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-collins-fla-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack