State v. Coleman

766 N.E.2d 601, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1425
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Coleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 Ohio St. 3d 1407
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 18, 2002·No. 1987-0192·Published

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-850340. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion for scheduling order,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Coleman, 766 N.E.2d 601, 95 Ohio St. 3d 1425 (Ohio 2002).

766 N.E.2d 601 (State v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.