State v. Coleman

292 S.W.3d 588, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1350, 2009 WL 2949326
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2009·No. No. ED 91873·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of trafficking in the second degree, in violation of section 195.223.3 RSMo (2000). The trial court found him to be a prior drug offender and a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to twelve years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Coleman, 292 S.W.3d 588, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1350, 2009 WL 2949326 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

292 S.W.3d 588 (State v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Collins
292 S.W.3d 588 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)