Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Coleman

State v. Coleman

677 A.2d 1372, 237 Conn. 931, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 272
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJuly 1, 1996
DocketSC 15468
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 677 A.2d 1372 (State v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Coleman, 677 A.2d 1372, 237 Conn. 931, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 272 (Colo. 1996).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 41 Conn. App. 255 (AC 12812), is granted, limited to the following isssues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court improperly disregard the state’s concession that, in this case, the defendant should not receive multiple punishment for his two burglary convictions?
“2. Whether, under our supervisory powers or the state constitution, we should adopt the presumption [932]*932set forth in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969), pertaining to the imposition of a greater sentence after having successfully attacked his first conviction?”
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15468. Temmy Ann Pieszak, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Harry Weller, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided July 1, 1996

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Coleman
700 A.2d 14 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
677 A.2d 1372, 237 Conn. 931, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-coleman-conn-1996.