State v. Cole

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Cole

722 A.2d 1217, 247 Conn. 937, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 428

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 3, 1998·No. SC 16039·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 312 (AC 17617), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[938] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16039. Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided November 3, 1998

“Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the trial court’s failure to define the term ‘wrongfulness’ under General Statutes § 53a-13 (a) was not improper?”

BORDEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 312 (AC 17617), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[938] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16039. Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided November 3, 1998

“Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the trial court’s failure to define the term ‘wrongfulness’ under General Statutes § 53a-13 (a) was not improper?”

BORDEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

State v. Cole, 722 A.2d 1217, 247 Conn. 937, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 428 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

722 A.2d 1217 (State v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related