State v. Cole

722 A.2d 1217, 247 Conn. 937, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 428
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 3, 1998
DocketSC 16039
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 722 A.2d 1217 (State v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Cole, 722 A.2d 1217, 247 Conn. 937, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 428 (Colo. 1998).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 312 (AC 17617), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[938]*938The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16039. Neal Cone, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided November 3, 1998

“Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the trial court’s failure to define the term ‘wrongfulness’ under General Statutes § 53a-13 (a) was not improper?”

BORDEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cole
755 A.2d 202 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
722 A.2d 1217, 247 Conn. 937, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cole-conn-1998.