State v. Colburn

182 A. 210, 134 Me. 494, 1936 Me. LEXIS 70
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJanuary 6, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 182 A. 210 (State v. Colburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Colburn, 182 A. 210, 134 Me. 494, 1936 Me. LEXIS 70 (Me. 1936).

Opinion

The respondent was indicted by the Grand Jury for Sagadahoc County for a violation of It. S. 1930, Ch. 136, Sec. 18. This is the statute making unlawful lotteries and schemes or devices of chance. The case is before us on report on an agreed statement, and the issue concerns the validity of a so-called “bank night” as conducted by the respondent in his moving-picture house in the City of Bath.

A recital of the facts as set forth in the agreed statement is unnecessary, as in the opinion of this Court they are insufficient to allow an intelligent decision of the problem presented to us. The entry must accordingly be: Report discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saltonstall v. Cumming
538 A.2d 289 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1988)
Matheson v. Bangor Publishing Co.
414 A.2d 1203 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1980)
State v. Foley
366 A.2d 172 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1976)
S S v. State
299 A.2d 560 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1973)
State v. Bailey
286 A.2d 603 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 A. 210, 134 Me. 494, 1936 Me. LEXIS 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-colburn-me-1936.