State v. Colburn

182 A. 210, 134 Me. 494, 1936 Me. LEXIS 70
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided January 6, 1936·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The respondent was indicted by the Grand Jury for Sagadahoc County for a violation of It. S. 1930, Ch. 136, Sec. 18. This is the statute making unlawful lotteries and schemes or devices of chance. The case is before us on report on an agreed statement, and the issue concerns the validity of a so-called “bank night” as conducted by the respondent in his moving-picture house in the City of Bath.

A recital of the facts as set forth in the agreed statement is unnecessary, as in the opinion of this Court they are insufficient to allow an intelligent decision of the problem presented to us. The entry must accordingly be: Report discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Colburn, 182 A. 210, 134 Me. 494, 1936 Me. LEXIS 70 (Me. 1936).

182 A. 210 (State v. Colburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saltonstall v. Cumming
538 A.2d 289 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1988)
Matheson v. Bangor Publishing Co.
414 A.2d 1203 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1980)
State v. Foley
366 A.2d 172 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1976)
S S v. State
299 A.2d 560 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1973)
State v. Bailey
286 A.2d 603 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1972)