State v. Colbert

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Colbert

99 Ohio St. 3d 1441

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 13, 2001·No. 2003-0033·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 80361, 2002-0hio-6315. Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this case, the court hereby allows the appeal and denies the cross-appeal.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be held for the decision in Supreme Court case No. 2002-1888, State v. Jordan, Cuyahoga App. No. 80675, 2002-Ohio-4587.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefing schedule be stayed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent from the allowance of the appeal. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., dissent from the denial of the cross-appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 80361, 2002-0hio-6315. Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this case, the court hereby allows the appeal and denies the cross-appeal.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be held for the decision in Supreme Court case No. 2002-1888, State v. Jordan, Cuyahoga App. No. 80675, 2002-Ohio-4587.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefing schedule be stayed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent from the allowance of the appeal. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., dissent from the denial of the cross-appeal.

State v. Colbert, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1441 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

99 Ohio St. 3d 1441 (State v. Colbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related