State v. Coit

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Coit

520 A.2d 345, 1987 Me. LEXIS 607

DecidedJanuary 22, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 520 A.2d 345 (State v. Coit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Coit, 520 A.2d 345, 1987 Me. LEXIS 607 (Me. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

On appeal, Charles Coit challenges the legality of the sentence imposed by the District Court (Kittery), on his plea of nolo contendere to a complaint alleging harassment in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 506-A (1983). Because no error in the sentence imposed appears plainly on the face of the record, we affirm the judgment. State v. Blanchard, 409 A.2d 229, 233 (Me.1979).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI