State v. Cohen

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Cohen

850 S.W.2d 125, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 512

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 13, 1993·No. Nos. 60093, 62043·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, Defendant appeals from his conviction for robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action and from the denial of his 29.15 motion. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b) and Rule 30.-25(b). No error of law appears and the motion court’s findings are supported by substantial and competent evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum for their information.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, Defendant appeals from his conviction for robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action and from the denial of his 29.15 motion. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b) and Rule 30.-25(b). No error of law appears and the motion court’s findings are supported by substantial and competent evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum for their information.

State v. Cohen, 850 S.W.2d 125, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 512 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

850 S.W.2d 125 (State v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.