State v. Coffman

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Coffman

260 S.W.3d 864, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1113, 2008 WL 3895924

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 26, 2008

DocketWD 68466

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 S.W.3d 864 (State v. Coffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Coffman, 260 S.W.3d 864, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1113, 2008 WL 3895924 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

*865 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Coffman was convicted of sexual assault following a jury trial in Boone County, Missouri. On appeal, Coffman contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal and in sentencing him on the jury’s verdict. Coffman argues that the State failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew the victim did not give her consent to the sexual intercourse. We affirm the trial court’s ruling.

Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*865 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Coffman was convicted of sexual assault following a jury trial in Boone County, Missouri. On appeal, Coffman contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal and in sentencing him on the jury’s verdict. Coffman argues that the State failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew the victim did not give her consent to the sexual intercourse. We affirm the trial court’s ruling.

Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 S.W.3d 864, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1113, 2008 WL 3895924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-coffman-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack