State v. Coffey
This text of 421 S.E.2d 360 (State v. Coffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Fred Howard COFFEY, Jr.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
James P. Cooney, III, Charlotte, for defendant.
Ellen B. Scouten, Asst. Atty. Gen., Peter S. Gilchrist, III, Dist. Atty., for the State.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant Appellant in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of Superior Court, Mecklenburg, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:
"Denied. Defendant shall, however, brief the question presented in this petition according to the expedited schedule as described herein. By order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of October 1992."
Accordingly, only those issues which are specifically enumerated in this order shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Defendant Appellant's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court on the 12th day of October 1992 and the State's brief will be filed on the 22nd day of October.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
421 S.E.2d 360, 1992 WL 277431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-coffey-nc-1992.