State v. . Coe

119 S.E. 926, 186 N.C. 776, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 353
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 14, 1923·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A careful examination of the record leaves us with the impression that the instant case has been tried substantially in accordance with the law bearing on the subject, and we have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which would seem to entitle the defendant to another hearing.

There is no error of law appearing on the record.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Coe, 119 S.E. 926, 186 N.C. 776, 1923 N.C. LEXIS 353 (N.C. 1923).

119 S.E. 926 (State v. . Coe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.