State v. Cody

650 So. 2d 1030, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 589, 1995 WL 37342
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 1995·No. No. 94-684·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

The decision previously issued in this case on July 12, 1994, is withdrawn, and this opinion is substituted in its place.

The State seeks reversal of the trial court’s dismissal of a prosecution pursuant to section 948.08(6), Florida Statutes (1993). We treat the prior notice of appeal as a petition for certiorari, see State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988); State v. Johnson, 306 So.2d 102 (Fla.1974), and determine that the order is void because no information had been filed at the time the dismissal was entered. See Ex Parte Reed, 101 Fla. 800, 135 So. 302 (1931); Zanger v. State, 548 So.2d 746 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Brehm v. State, 427 So.2d 825 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). We note that the State may still proceed to file an information, and thereafter is entitled to appeal any subsequent dismissal of that information. See Fla.RApp.P. 9.140(c)(1)(A).

Certiorari granted; order quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Cody, 650 So. 2d 1030, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 589, 1995 WL 37342 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

650 So. 2d 1030 (State v. Cody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brehm v. State
427 So. 2d 825 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Zanger v. State
548 So. 2d 746 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
State v. Pettis
520 So. 2d 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
State v. Johnson
306 So. 2d 102 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Ex Parte Reed
135 So. 302 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)