State v. Codeluppi

986 N.E.2d 1021, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1431

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Codeluppi. Read the opinion of the Court — 139 Ohio St. 3d 165 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 2013·No. 2013-0186·Published

Opinion

Lorain App. No. 11CA010133, 2012-Ohio-5812. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger and O’Neill, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II.

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Codeluppi, 986 N.E.2d 1021, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1431 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

986 N.E.2d 1021 (State v. Codeluppi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.