State v. Coco

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Coco

366 So. 2d 558, 1979 La. LEXIS 7935

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 12, 1979

DocketNo. 63638

StatusPublished

This text of 366 So. 2d 558 (State v. Coco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Coco, 366 So. 2d 558, 1979 La. LEXIS 7935 (La. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Craig S. Coco, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Jefferson Parish.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Nestor Cur-rault, Jr., Judge of the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Jefferson, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 26th day of January, 1979, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be assigned by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Craig S. Coco, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Jefferson Parish.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Nestor Cur-rault, Jr., Judge of the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Jefferson, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 26th day of January, 1979, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be assigned by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

366 So. 2d 558, 1979 La. LEXIS 7935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-coco-la-1979.