State v. Cockrell

408 S.W.3d 218, 2013 WL 3055269, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 666
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 2013·No. No. ED 98359·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Duron Cockrell (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his convictions by a jury for one count of attempted first-degree rape, in violation of Section 566.032, RSMo 2000,1 and one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, in violation of Section 566.062, for which Defendant was sentenced, as a prior offender, to ten years’ and a concurrent eighteen-years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Cockrell, 408 S.W.3d 218, 2013 WL 3055269, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 666 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

408 S.W.3d 218 (State v. Cockrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.