State v. Cockhearn

Arizona Supreme Court

State v. Cockhearn

391 P.2d 597, 96 Ariz. 44, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 225

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedApril 23, 1964

DocketNo. 1425

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 391 P.2d 597 (State v. Cockhearn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cockhearn, 391 P.2d 597, 96 Ariz. 44, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 225 (Ark. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of robbery and sentenced to an indeterminate term of five to ten years. The transcript of testimony shows that a filling station had been held up and robbed at gun point. The filling station attendant identified appellant as the person who held the gun on him. Appellant and his companion demanded money. A short time thereafter appellant and some companions were stopped by police who had been alerted to the fact that an armed robbery had taken place and had a description of the car used by appellant and his companions. In the car were found money, a loaded gun which was identified by the filling station attendant as similar to the one used in the robbery, and the keys to the filling station. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty and was represented by counsel at the trial.

Appellant filed his notice of appeal in propria persona and counsel was appointed by the trial court pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-161 to handle his appeal. Counsel advised this court by written communication that he had searched the record including the transcript of testimony and has been unable to find grounds on which an appeal could be based. This court ordered the appeal be submitted. On examination of the record and transcript we find no reversible error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of robbery and sentenced to an indeterminate term of five to ten years. The transcript of testimony shows that a filling station had been held up and robbed at gun point. The filling station attendant identified appellant as the person who held the gun on him. Appellant and his companion demanded money. A short time thereafter appellant and some companions were stopped by police who had been alerted to the fact that an armed robbery had taken place and had a description of the car used by appellant and his companions. In the car were found money, a loaded gun which was identified by the filling station attendant as similar to the one used in the robbery, and the keys to the filling station. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty and was represented by counsel at the trial.

Appellant filed his notice of appeal in propria persona and counsel was appointed by the trial court pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-161 to handle his appeal. Counsel advised this court by written communication that he had searched the record including the transcript of testimony and has been unable to find grounds on which an appeal could be based. This court ordered the appeal be submitted. On examination of the record and transcript we find no reversible error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

391 P.2d 597, 96 Ariz. 44, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cockhearn-ariz-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack